A word on astrology
My personal understanding of astrology is as a complex, naturally derived system for the imaginative interpretation of patterns — specifically, those that occur within the spatial and temporal arrangement of astral bodies. This arrangement is dynamic, continually moving in spirallic cycles. By this, I mean that while no two temporal moments ever contain precisely the same spatial configuration of bodies, we can nonetheless discern patterns of repetition across time. The rotation of Earth around its sun and our moon around Earth, for instance, produce reliable rhythms that are readily perceptible, so much so that they are widely taken for granted. Yet, the state of the rhythmic system’s contents is not quite identical in each successive rotation – everything is forever changing, building on what came before but differentiating itself from its predecessors. It is continually developing through a rhythmic process.
The practice of astrological enquiry can be a means of observing the layout of our wider, extra-terrestrial environment – finding the patterns of repetition that keep the continual flux of things on a coherent track. It might be said that, as far as this point goes, we might as well practice astronomy (as clearly distinct from astrology). If we seek the teachings of science, then that’s no doubt the case. If, however, we want to pursue the arcane art of receiving guidance from our surroundings — guidance that goes beyond the purely practical meeting of physical needs, that helps us in crafting meaningful answers to certain philosophic questions that have no fixed answers — then we may choose to move into the realm of symbolic interpretation.
I believe that astrology continues to enjoy mainstream popularity because it provides a framework for self-reflection with a long and irrepressible history. Its established nature means that very little interpretive skill is demanded on the part of the casual inquirer. Yet it remains, for those who desire to penetrate deeper, an avenue for exercising archetypal, imaginative and interpretive artistry. No rule book can definitively state that there is one true way of understanding astral symbols, just as none can definitively state that there is one true way of reading words (these, too, being a type of symbol). This is the case despite the fact that, in general, we do use symbols in communally acknowledged ways to convey meanings that are at least roughly agreed upon. A dictionary is a guide only, not a binding force.
—-NS